There seems to be a growing debate online between the "Airplanes, Explosives and Nano-Thermite" believers vs. the "No planes, Directed Energy & Dustification" believers.
It is disheartening to know that we all want the truth, but seem to so strongly stand on one side of the fence vs. another when it comes to the topic of what happened to the Twin Towers.
The "Architects & Engineers (AE) for 9/11 Truth" is a huge organization and has made large waves in the 9/11 truth movement seeking a "Real 9/11 investigation". This group stands by the "what is scientifically provable" argument. The group believes that "Airplanes, Explosives and Nano-Thermite" were the cause of the Twin Tower collapses, since this is what can be proved by "known" scientific experiments.
On the other side of the fence are the Dr. Judy Wood followers, who claim that "No airplanes, Directed Energy & Dustification" were used to bring down the Twin Towers.
Before going any further, please know that this article will be jumping on and off both sides of this debate and will review each of the three claims made on both sides of the fence drawing a conclusion at the end.
Section 1: The Airplanes (claims vs. beliefs)
AE for 9/11 Truth claims that physical airplanes were both observed and recorded in the sky and impacting the towers on 9/11.
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers believe that some type of image "fakery" was used to create the appearance of airplanes in the sky.
Section 2: Explosives (claims vs. beliefs)
AE for 9/11 Truth claims that video evidence shows the towers being blown apart by sequential explosions all the way down the buildings from one group of floors to the next that are seen from multiple video angles.
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers repeatedly fail to acknowledge the existence of these explosions this in their videos and focus their sole accusations on "Directed Energy".
Section 3: Nano-Thermite (claims vs. beliefs)
AE for 9/11 Truth claims that nano-thermite may have been used to cause the initial structural failure of the towers causing the collapse to begin which was then completed by the sequential explosions discussed in Section 2.
Note: Although we cannot all agree these claims are true, all accounts show the presence of Nano-Thermite in the World Trade Center rubble which implies it could have been implemented into the building prior to the 9/11 attacks.
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers believe that a material resembling Nano-Thermite in the World Trade Center dust is the result of some type of "Directed Energy" which has changed the molecular structure of some of the materials in the buildings.
Section 4: No Airplanes (claims vs. beliefs)
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers claim that some type of image "fakery" was used to create the appearance of airplanes in the sky. Since all video recordings agree the speed of United Air Flight 175 impacting the South Tower was roughly 580mph, the argument is that the object witnessed in the sky could not have been an airplane. The argument states that no commercial airplanes have enough power or can be accurately flown at this speed at 1000 ft. above see level since they would require much larger engines due to the dense air thickness at sea level or they would experience uncontrollable lift and would be impossible to hit their physical targets. The claim also states that the airplanes would most likely break apart at this rate of speed due to the dense air thickness at such low altitude.
Note: We cannot all agree these claims are true, however there is video evidence showing missing wing-tips, missing wings, failed airplane video image regeneration from one frame to the next, and existing cloaking technology that can be viewed and recorded from any angle.
AE for 9/11 Truth believe this is not accurate and what was witnessed as airplanes are what were actually in the sky.
Section 5: Directed Energy (claims vs. beliefs)
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers claim that video evidence shows that some type "Directed Energy Weapon" was used on 9/11 to target specific buildings at the World Trade Center complex that would upset the molecular structure of steel, concrete, glass, dry wall, marble and various other materials on 9/11 causing them to turn into dust (powder) within seconds.
Note: We cannot all agree Directed Energy was used however the lack of building material and building contents at the ground zero site on 9/11 indicate something abnormal happened to the buildings and none of the destroyed buildings on 9/11 experienced a "typical" collapse.
AE for 9/11 Truth believe this "Directed Energy" theory cannot be scientifically proven and that the buildings were destroyed by sequential explosions.
Note: It appears sequential explosions were to some degree the reason why the towers were destroyed. However, this does not explain why the the lack of building material and lack of seismic activity that should have been experienced by two 500,000 ton buildings hitting the ground. It also does not explain why the marble facing on the World Financial Center across the street was simply missing from the building and not on the ground.
Section 6: Dustification (claims vs. beliefs)
Dr. Judy Wood and her followers claim that video evidence shows that the towers were turned into dust before they hit the ground and that the inside structure and contents of the buildings were being dissolved and sucked out of the buildings in a powered "lather" format. They claim that when enough physical material was removed the inside of the buildings a gravity driven collapse of the external skeleton of the buildings was imminent. This explains the lack of seismic activity, lack of building materials and contents at the ground zero site and the 700 ft. tall section of core columns that faint and fall into themselves while being blown away in the wind.
Note: We can all agree with Dr. Judy Wood and her followers there was a lack of seismic activity, lack of building materials and contents at the ground zero site and a 700 ft. tall section of core columns that fainted and fell into itself while being blown away in the wind.
AE for 9/11 Truth believe this "Dustification" was caused by explosives and have chosen to ignore the lack of seismic activity, lack of building materials and contents at the ground zero site and have ignored the 700 ft. tall section of core columns that fainted and fell into itself while being blown away in the wind.
Section 7: Conclusion
Yes, airplanes were seen in the sky from all angles, however who is to say they were actually airplanes? As for the sequential explosions theory going off on each floor below the collapse, Dr. Judy Wood ignores this video evidence during her analysis. The video evidence does appear to show timed explosions of the floors being blown out all the way down buildings. This evidence cannot be ignored or denied.
However, it was not just the two towers and WTC building 7 that were destroyed on 9/11. All seven World Trade center buildings plus other buildings in the area were destroyed on 9/11. See the official government exhibit map showing all of the buildings that had both "Full" and "Partial" collapse. The one across the street to the South is the Banker's Trust Building. Note that World Trade Center Building 3 and the walkway across West St. also collapsed. As for the Twin Towers, the core columns caught on video that Dr. Judy Wood points out turning into dust cannot be denied. Also, there is video recorded from the East of this sequence that shows a massive structural steel column tipping to the North and then quickly turning to dust and blowing away to the South as these core columns come into view. Just that one column alone could have weighed nearly 50,000 pounds. Dr. Judy Wood missed this in her analysis and this evidence adds more fuel to her argument.
There is no denying that hundreds of thousands of pounds of structural steel fainted and blew away in the wind. This evidence could explain why such limited seismic activity was experienced by the towers collapsing.
Nano-thermite, under most any test, would not be able to yield this result. Also, all desks, file cabinets, floors, walls and every surface in every World Trade Center Building would have needed to have the nano-thermite paint applied and then ignited and burned at a fast enough rate to be able to physically disintegrate within seconds. If this were to have actually happened, the buildings would have lit up lower Manhattan like the sun. Even if all of the structural steel in the buildings were painted with this material, it is still an impossibility to turn that much steel and other material into dust.
An estimated 3000 file cabinets were in the two towers alone. Why is it that only one file cabinet was found, and why was it barely recognizable as a file cabinet? The same is true for the missing sinks, toilets, desks, chairs, structural steel, concrete and most other building materials and contents. They all seemed to inexplicably turn to dust. Jet fuel, nor nano-thermite, nor explosives could have turned the Twin Towers, their contents and other structures in the area into mostly dust. Although we cannot deny the evidence that explosives were indeed used all over the World Trade Center complex, it is here where Dr. Judy Wood appears to be correct. It appears some type of "Directed Energy" was used on 9/11 to target specific buildings at the World Trade Center complex to upset the molecular structure of steel, concrete, glass, dry wall, marble and various other materials on 9/11 causing them to turn into dust (powder) within seconds.
Finally, we can all agree that this conclusion appears to be incomprehensible and inconceivable in our current civilian mindset and realm. Therefore, was Black Budget technology used on 9/11 and is this why no "known scientific experiments" can reproduce the effect of what actually happened around the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11?
The author is willing to both defend or abandon this argument should further evidence come along pointing to a more plausible conclusion.
As a side note, while these three theories on each side are grouped together, this is sometimes used against each other in the 9/11 Truth movement. For example some pages try to disprove the "Directed Energy" theory so they conclude by default that the "No Planes" theory is also invalid. All of the theories on both sides stand alone on their own accord. What is stated in this article are the loose groupings of theories that the 9/11 Truth movement has grown to acknowledge. Please research all information above and draw your own conclusions.
